Evidence and Documents
Court Rules on Judicial Recusal
Evidence of Judicial Violations (including CRIMINAL Perversion of the Due Course of Justice) by the Judiciary of England and Wales
List of Services
-
Exhibit Ref: 1
Date: 9th January 1998
Item: The Constitutional Monarch and Head of UK Government (1952 - 2022) HRM The Queen, Elizabeth Windsor II Letter; INSTRUCTIVELY DIRECTING the then Lord Chancellor, Lord Irvine of Lairg to RESOLVE Judicial Violations Complain, which consequently led to Tony Blair's EXPEDIENT abolishment of the Department in 2003, in apprehension of a Constitutional crisis being triggered on any revelations of the Lord Chancellor and his Department's HYPOCRITICAL CRIMINAL BEHAVIOUR amounting to STATE LAW BREAKING get out to the over Governed, over Oppressed and over Trusting British public.
-
Exhibit Ref:
Date: 02 March 2001
Item: Lord Chancellor's Department Letter which INADVERTENTLY CONFIRMED the VIOLATION occuring before Justice Toulson in 1999 and that it was in an EX-PARTE Application on behalf of Reynolds Porter Chamberlain Solicitors, where Justice Toulson's younger brother Mr A.K Toulson is the Senior Partner with UNQUESTIONABLE DIRECT/DIRECT INTEREST. Only to then go on and SUBSTANTIALLY MISLEAD on facts of law as regards Judicial Recusal and Disqualification of Justices and Judges from Hearing Cases involving their Family, close and distant Relatives or Friends INTEREST; Utilising the less relevant Locabail (UK) Ltd V Bayfield Properties case law rather than the more potent and established Dimes V Proprietors of Grand Junction Canal and others, HL 26th June 1852; to summarily through the unsuspecting off course in what can only be DELIBERATE PERVERSION of JUSTICE of the highest order !!!
-
Exhibit Ref:
Date: 12th December 2003
Item: Croydon Crown Court Judge Christopher Pratt's DELEBERATE Misrepresentation of the law to an OVER TRUSTING and UNSUSPECTING JURY, INSTRUCTED IN DIRECTIONAL SUMMARY to convict an unremediated victim of Judicial Corruption and State law-breaking CONTRARY TO SECTION 7(1)(b) HRA 1998 and ARTICLE 7 HRA 1998; (Pages 5, 6, & 19) on a WHOLLY ABSURD and PERVERTED FALSE CLAIM that '... there is no Defences of Justification in English law ...' when in actuality, there are. I.E DURESS, NECESSITY, etc., are all Lawful Excuse Defences under Justification. As a matter of fact Six Greenpeace climate Change Activist used Justification Defence at Maidstone Crown Court 10th September 2008. After attemptig to shut down the Kingsnorth coal-fired power station in Kent by scaling the chimney and painting the Prime Minister’s name down the side. The defendants argued that by shutting down the coal plant for a day, they prevented greater damage to even more valuable property. The jury’s verdict was an instance in which prevention of property damage resulting from the impacts of climate change was used as a lawful excuse Justification Defence in Court let alone English law !!!
-
Exhibit Ref:
Date: 17th July 2009
Item: Royal Court of Justice, Appeal Court Judge, Lord Justice Thomas covert UNLAWFULL instruction via fax to the Prison Authorities, directing them NOT to produce a Self Representing Appellant to Court for his own Appeal Hearing; in further breach of Article 6 HRA 1998. The purpose of course was to gag and prevent the Appellant from having revelations damaging to the integrity of the Judiciary input into the proceedings.
As the Judge's conduct is UNLAWFUL because he shoiuld NOT have directly/indirectly encouraged, or instructed anybody let alone the Prison Authorities, holding a person, not to produce them for their very own Hearing; most especially when that person is their own lawyer and nobody else represent them as the Judge knows very, very, well.
-
Exhibit Ref:
Date: 26th February 2023
Item: DEFENDANT COUNTERCLAIM and DEFENCE STATEMENT mailed 6th March 2023 to Wimbledon Magistrates' Court by Registered post, requiring PROOF of Delivery; but was DISHONESTLY claimed not to have been received at all by the Court Management and its Justices' Clerk CRIME SYNDICATE; in what tantamount to nothing short of Criminal Negligent and PERVERSION of the due Course of Justice, as the Judiciary and its agents sought to hid IRREFUTABLE EVIDENCE of unremedaited Judicial Violations and law-breaking FACTS asserted into the Document, in DIRECTE Challenge to the Judiciary's Jurisdional Authority as an Habitual and Unrepentent law-breaker under ARTICLE 6 HRA 1998 and ARTICLE 7 HRA 1998. Hence the Courts' omission of Defendant Counterclaim and Defence Statements from Court Procedural Hearing Process, (on FALSE claims that it was NEVER received at all; only to be later proven to be a lie and utter fabrication it was formally forced to be RESCINDED in writing when proof of Post and Delivery could not conceivably be contested) was NOT accidental, but DELIBERATE WHITE COLLAR CRIMINAL PERVERSION OF THE DUE COURSE OF JUSTICE.
-
Exhibit Ref:
Date: 21st May 2024
Item: HM Courts & Tribunal Service
Letter Confirming in WRITING after the events that it had infact recieved the entire paperwork sent to the court by registered post (which it had previously, profusely denied ever receiving). It confirms the Courts ABJECT failure in the functional performance of its duty, most particularly with regards ensuring DEFENDANT'S STATEMENTS inclusion into the Hearing's Adjudication Process. It then goes on to offer apologies for these failures which resulted in an UNLAWFUL 42 Days Committal to Imprisonment ENTIRELY SERVED and NEFARIOUSLY prevented from being Appealed, (first by the White Collar Crime Syndicate at Wimbledon Magistrates' Court who COLLUDED to summarily Dismiss the Appeal Application as frivolous, followed by the Appeal Court's Administrative Management White Collar Crime Syndicate, who persistently institued UNLAWFUL FEES DEMANDS to prevent the RIGHT of Appeal following Conviction from from being processed through to the Appeal Courts) in a DELIBERATE bid to avoid ACCOUNTABILITY. -
Exhibit Ref:
Date: 24th May 2024
Item: First line attempt to exercise Appeal Right in Direct Application to Wimbledon Magistrates' to State Case for an Appeal to the High Court, as in accordance with SECTION 111(1) Magistrates' Courts Act 1980 on specific points of law issues regarding:
a) the Court and its Management's MONUMENTAL failure to adhere to Procedural Rules, Process and Guidlines requiring it under the principles of FAIRNESS, to assert Defendant Statement and Counterclaim into the Adjudication Process.
b) the Court's total DISREGARD for UNREMEDIATED Defendant Victim's Rights to INVOKE CONFERRED Rights (Section 7(1)(a) HRA 1998; Section 7(1)(b) HRA 1998 and Article 7 HRA 1998) in any legal proceedings instigated by a public authority.
However the Judge being control of the Crime Syndicate, REFUSED the Application claiming that it is frivolous, when he ought to know that there can be nothing frivolous about, a Hearing which breach Process and Procedural Rules. Such breach makes the entire Adjudication NULL and VOID !!!
-
Exhibit Ref:
Date: 20th May 2024
Item: Royal Court of Justice, Appellant Application Insistence under SECTION 111(6) Magistrates' Court Act 1980 to EXERCISE a Right of Appeal on specific points of law Grounds raised in the original 24th May 2024 Application to Wimbledon Magistrates Court to State a Case for an Appeal to the High Court, by route of a FORCED Judicial Review Application CHALLENGING Wimbledon Magistrates Court UNLAWFUL REFUSAL to State Case in Appeal on specific points of law considerations, THROUGH a MANDAMUS (MANDATORY) ORDER requiring Wimbledon Magistrates' Court immedaitely DESIST from denying a Right of Appeal conferred in law, to have the SAFETY and LAWFULLNESS of a Proceedings in a Magistrates Court SCRUTINISED or challenged.
however the WHITE COLLAR CRIME SYNDICATE Refused to Process the Appeal, as it sought to install ARTIFICIAL HURDLES including EXTORTIONATE FEES to prevent citizens from exhorting their Right to Appeal following Conviction.
-
New List Item
Date: 25th November 2024
Item: HM Courts & Tribunal Communications, which shows how the Administrative Court WHITE COLLAR Crime Syndicates use extortionate FEE DEMANDS to MANIPULATE unsuspecting Appellants into either paying or giving up their RIGHTS to CHALLENGE A JUDCIAL DECISION, following CONVICTION. As can be perused, even though I qualified on Application for FEES EXEMPTION, the Administrative Court WHITE COLLAR Crime Syndicate, REFUSED to allow me to EXERCISE the Right to have the Lawfullness and Safety of a Judicial Proceeding's OUTCOME obtained OUTSIDE the confines of the RULE of Law examined; unless I am willing to pay them £169.oo, which I did not have as an unemployed person at the time. However, when I refused to pay as can be seen in the 5th August 2024 email to the Appeal Court Administrative Office, it was MAGICALLY realised, '... I Do Not Need to Pay the Court Fees ...' as conveyed in their 7th August 2024 consequent response.
-
New List Item
Date: 25th November 2024
Item: EVIDENCE OF ELABORATE CRIMINAL OBFUSCATION AND PERVERTED NEGLIGENT REPRESENTATION OF COURT PROCEEDING RECORDS AND DOCUMENTATIONS by HM Courts & Tribunal Administrative Court Management WHITE COLLAR CRIME SYNDICATE to deny Justice.
UK Authorities and the Judicial Complaints Office Failures to Act on ARROGANT Assumptions of Judicial Integrity, Prior to Any Investigations into the Facts!
Evidence of the Legal Profession's RELUCTANCE to Aid Civil Actions Articulating MALICIOUS Prosecution by the Metropolitan Police; Especially JUDICIAL Violations of SEVERAL Articles of the Human Rights Act 1998
List of Services
-
Exhibit Ref:
Date: 5th September 2003
Item: Gareth Peirce Solicitors Letter
-
Exhibit Ref:
Date: 24th March 2004
Item: Bhatt Murphy Solicitors Letter
-
Exhibit Ref:List Item 1
Date: 2 April 2004
Item: Bhatt Murphy Solicitors Letter
-
Exhibit Ref:List Item 3
Date: 22nd April 2004
Item: Grenville J Walker Solicitors Letter
-
Exhibit Ref:List Item 2
Date: 19 July 2004
Item: Birnberg Peirce & Partners Letter
-
Exhibit Ref:List Item 4
Date: 8th July 2005
Item: Carter Moore Solicitors Letter
-
Exhibit Ref:
Date: 3 February 2006
Item: Public Interest Lawyers Letter
-
Exhibit Ref:
Date: 18 April 2006
Item: Deighton Guedalla Solicitors Letter
-
Exhibit Ref:
Date 11th June 2006
Item: Complain to the Department for Constitutional Affairs about the unwillingness of the Legal Profession (CONTRARY TO GOVERNMENT PROPAGANDA PROJECTING LEGAL ASSISTANCE AVAILABILITY ACROSS THE BOARD WITHOUT PREJUDICE) to assist VICTIMS PURSUE CIVIL CLAIMS in redress against the Metropolitan Police Commissioner for Malicious Prosecution, following full Acquittals of all charges. Theses include the observation that the Legal Profession FEAR even more, to be seen DARING to provide help to VICTIMS seeking to bring action against for JUDICIAL Violations UNLESS approved them to do so.
-
New List Item
Date: 8th September 2006
Item: Law Society Letter
-
Exhibit Ref:
Date: 28th August 2014
Item: Letter from Custody to State Legal Aid Representatives Charles Allotey Solicitors
-
Exhibit Ref:
Date: 8th September 2014
Item: Letter from Custody to State Legal Aid Representatives Charles Allotey Solicitors
-
Exhibit Ref:
Date: 16th September 2014
Item: Letter from Custody to State Legal Aid Representatives Charles Allotey Solicitors, Formally DISMISSING them from the specific Case Legal Aid Representation, for their apparen continued reluctance to present Judicial Corruption facts and Evidence arguments to the Court, in line with Defence Counterclaim INSTRUCTIONS.
Complaints to the Judicial Authorities of England and Wales, its Lord Chief Justice and Lord Chancellor
List of Services
-
New List Item
Date: 21st June 2004
Item: Complaint to Inner London Crown Court About Overdue and Outstanding RIGHT of Appeal pending since 6th January 2003; which had an Appeal Route from Highbury Corner Magistrates Court to Inner London Crown Court, but CORRUPTLY prevented from being exercised by the WHITE COLLAR CRIME SYNDICATE which sought to prevent Judicial Violations evidence from Court processes.
-
New List Item
Date: 24th November 2005
Item: Further demands to the Judiciary in complain to Inner London Crown Court, about SIX DEFENDANT RIGHTS of Appeal pending since 6th January 2003, which under normal circumstances would have been HEARD at the Crown Court, or TRANSFERRED to the Royal Court of Appeal for a HEARING on the Grounds submitted in the Appeal Notice.
-
New List Item
Date: 28th December 2005
Item: Complaint to the ACTING Lord Chancellor, Charles Falconer about the FAILURE of the Judiciary and its Courts to provide long overdue Appeal Rights, duly INVOKED and submitted to the CONVICTING COURT within the time limitation periods; but was being DELIBERATELY FRUSTRATED from the normal APPEAL route process by WHITE COLLAR CRIME SYNDICATE in the Court Administrative Management, wishing to prevent any form of Judicial ACCOUNTABILITY to the law.
-
New List Item
Date: 16th January 2006
Item: Complain to the ACTING Lord Chancellor, Charles Falconer, following Inner London Crown Court ASTONISHING claim that it does NOT have any Records of our Appeals, nor any of the SIX named APPELLANTS who lodged an Appeal to the Court 13th January 2003,
-
Exhibit Ref:
Date: 5th September 2012
Item: Chris Grayling, Secretary of State for Justice letter
-
Exhibit Ref:
Date: 17th May 2016
Item: Letter to The Ministry of Justice, HM Courts & Tribunals
-
New List Item
Date: 8th November 2017
Item: Complain to David Lidington, Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice
-
New List Item
Date: 9th September 2019
Item: Complain to Robert Buckland, Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice
-
New List Item
Date: 1st June 2020
Item: Notice of Intent to Robert Buckland, Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice
-
New List Item
Date: 13th October 2021
Item: Complain to Dominic Raab, Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice
-
New List Item
Date: 25th June 2024
Item: Complaint to Administrative Court Office, Royal Court of Justice, about the blatant TRICKS Employed by the Judiciary's Court Administrative Office to UNLAWFULLY prevent me from Entering the Appeal Court to Exercise an Appeal RIGHT following Conviction in total breach of all Due Process by Wimbledon Magistrates Court.
-
New List Item
Date: 17th September 2024
Item: Complaint to the Head of the Judiciary, Chief Justice of England and Wales (Sue Lascelles Carr)
Response from the Judicial Authorities of England and Wales, its Lord Chief Justice and Lord Chancellor
List of Services
-
Exhibit Ref:
Date: 02 March 2001
Item: Lord Chancellor's Department Letter which unequivically captures the Department CONFIRMING Judicial Violation by Justice Toulson and then WITTINGLY/UNWITTINGLY Misrepresenting the law regarding Judicial Recusal in Cases involving Blood Relations, Friends, Neighbours, Colleagues and Acquaintances SEEMING/APPARENT interest; in order to protect long established friends and colleaques in the legal Fraternity.
-
New List Item
Date: 3rd September 2002
Item: Lord Chancellor's Department Letter superficially dispatched to give False impressions that matters complained about were being seriously considered, contrary to the facts, as it ensured there was no Document File Refencing Record, for any serious contemplations of ACCOUNTABILITY.
-
Exhibit Ref:
Date: 03 December 2003
Item: The Judiciary's Lord Chief Justice Letter Skillfully Passing the Buck as usual, by DIRECTING that the complaints fall under the Jurisdiction of other section, such as the Lord Chancellor's Department, but CONVENIENTLY NEVER directly their own responsibility despite bearing pompous tiltles identifying them as HEAD OF THE JUDICIARY.
-
New List Item
Date: 3rd February 2004
Item: Department for Constitutional Affairs Letter ENCAPSULATING the general INTIMIDATION TACTICS, sought to coerce my abandonment of all Camplaints, by the FEAR they thought they could project on to me; Whilst making no effort at all to address the substantive Violations complained of the Judiciary complained of.
-
New List Item
Date: 5th April 2004
Item: Department for Constitutional Affairs Continued ATTEMPT TO INTIMIDATE by STILL PERSISTING to make it known that it is keeping a file on me, WITHOUT making any effort to address the substantive issues of Judicial Violations complainted of.
-
New List Item
Date: 14th March 2005
Item: Department for Constitutional Affairs Letter DEPICTING how the Department sumarily FAILED to Address Complaints born of Administrative INCOMPETENCE and LAZINESS.
-
New List Item
Date: 18th May 2005
Item: Department for Constitutional Affairs Continued ATTEMPT TO INTIMIDATE by making it known that it is keeping a file on me, WITHOUT ever making any effort to address the substantive Judicial CRIMINAL Perversion of the Due Course of Justice Violations complainted of.
-
Exhibit Ref:
Date: 7th June 2007
Item: Ministry of Justice Letter Attempting to SHIRK all its Duties and Responsibilities as pertaining to Justice Toulson's Violations of the Rule of Law; Gross Judicial Criminal Pervesion of Justice; UK Courts HABITUAL Violations of Section 7(1)(a) HRA 1998; Section 7(1)(b) HRA 1998; Violations of Article 6 HRA 1998; Violations of Article 7 HRA 1998; etc., including UNLAWFUL Imprisonments; False Arrest and Metropolitan Police Department Failures to Record and Investigate Judicial Criminal Perversion of Justice Complaints, as entirely the Responsibilities of the Home Office Department, when clearly it is NOT the case.
-
New List Item
Date: 28th August 2007
Item: The Office for Judicial Complaints Letter which in typical ARROGANT and IGNORAMOUS fashion of the office HOLDER, PRESUME in total absence of the facts, that COMPLAINT'S alleging JUDICIAL Misconduct is arising because of dissatisfaction with a Judicial decision, that has access to an unobstructed functioning Appeal System; when if he had NOT been so bone lazy and presumptuous, it would have easily been discovered that was not the case at all.
Complaints to Constituent M.P (Kate Hoey, Tessa Jowell and Helen Hayes)
List of Services
-
Exhibit Ref:
Date: 5th May 2004
Item: Complain to Prime Minister Tony Blair
-
Exhibit Ref:List Item 3
Date: 17th May 2004
Item: Kate Hoey, the then Labour Party Parliamentary Constituency Representative
-
Exhibit Ref:
Date: 2nd March 2006
Item: Kate Hoey, the then Labour Party Parliamentary Constituency Representative
-
Exhibit Ref;
Date: 26th November 2014
Item: Complain to Tesdsa Jowell, Labour Party, Parliamentary Constituency Representative, about a 75 page documented evidence complaint against corrupted members of the judiciary for On-Going Systemic Violations and Perversions of the Due Process of Law; for forwarding to the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman
-
New List Item
Date: 26th Decemberb 2014
Item: Complain to Tesdsa Jowell, Labour Party, Parliamentary Constituency Representative, about wholly Corrupt and Bigoted Institutional Gatekeepers, Denying Lawful Application of Complaint To The Parliamentary And Health Service Ombudsman, For On-Going Systemic Violations And Perversions Of The Due Process Of Law
-
New List Item
Date: 1st January 2015
Item: Further Complain to Tessa Jowell, Labour Party, Parliamentary Constituency Representative, about her refusing (as my MP) to forward my Complaint Application of 21st October 2013 to the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman.
-
Exhibit Ref;
Date: 15th April 2016
Item: Complain to Jeremy Corbyn, Labour Shadow Government Leader about my CONSTITUENT M.P. HELEN HAYES's lack of representation in the issues brought to her attention since taking over from Tessa Jowell
-
Exhibit Ref;
Date: 13th October 2019
Item: Letter to Labour CONSTITUENT M.P. HELEN HAYES who repetitively for expediency purposes only continue to ask for the same information again and agin WITHOUT really doing anything with what is is told because it is DAMAGING to the Metropolitan Police Department who failed to Act on Judicial Criminalty Complaints, she HASN'T an onunce of courage to pursue, just like all those chasing an ambitious political Career DARE not . pursue the matter, if they have skelingtons in the wardrobe.
Complaints to Prime Minister; (Tony Blair, Gordon Brown, David Cameron, Theresa May, Boris Johnson, Rishi Sunak and Kier Starmer)
List of Services
-
Exhibit Ref:
Date: 5th May 2004
Item: Complain to Prime Minister Tony Blair
-
Exhibit Ref:
Date: 5th May 2005
Item: Complain to Prime Minister Tony Blair about Judicial Corruption, False Imprisonment & Human Rights Abuses in the UK
-
Exhibit Ref:
Date: 15th October 2006
Item: Complain to Prime Minister Tony Blair
-
Exhibit Ref:
Date: 4th July 2007
Item: Complain to Prime Minister Gordon Brown about Unresolved Complaints Of Judicial Corruption & Unlawful Imprisonments In The UK, Violating Both National And International Obligations To Respect Human Rights And The Rule of Law
-
Exhibit Ref:
Date: 8th June 2009
Item: Further Complain to Prime Minister Gordon Brown about Unresolved Complaints Of Judicial Corruption & Unlawful Imprisonments In The UK, Violating Both National And International Obligations To Respect Human Rights And The Rule of Law
-
Exhibit Ref:
Date: 15th August 2011
Item: Complain to Prime Minister David Cameron
-
Exhibit Ref:
Date: 11th May 2016
Item: Complain to Prime Minister David Cameron pointing out the hypocrisy in his outspoken comment on corruption in Nigeria, whilst himself and family being beneficiaries of tax heavens (Blairmore Holding) and the Metropolitan Police Department, insistently failing here in the UK to take criminal complaints SERIOUS for investigations (because of ‘a protection of establishment mentality) and the Judiciary continuing to UNLAWFULLY block victims access to bring proceedings against violating UK institutional authorities, as provisioned in Section 7(1)(a) HRA 1998; I suggest you SHUT-UP as you (alongside your government) are no less corrupt and hypocritical of those you criticize for having a tiny spec of dust in their eyes, whilst you have a great big plank of wood in your eyes.
-
Exhibit Ref;
Date: 21st August 2016
Item: Complain to Conservative Prime Minister Theresa May
-
Exhibit Ref;
Date: 25th July 2019
Item: Complain to Prime Minister Boris Johnson about Judicial Corruption, False Imprisonment & Human Rights Abuses in the UK
-
Exhibit Ref;
Date: 25th December 2019
Item: Complain to Prime Minister Boris Johnson
-
Exhibit Ref;
Date: 25th June 2023
Item: Complain to Prime Minister Rishi Sunak
Response From Prime Minister 10, Downing Street
List of Services
-
Exhibit Ref:
Date: 20th May 2004
Item: Prime Minister Tony Blair 10 Downing Street Letter, stating that he has INSTRUCTED that my complaint embodied in the letter addressed to him be passed to the Home Office which particularly has responsibility for the matters raised thereof.
-
Exhibit Ref:
Date: 18th March 2005
Item: Further Prime Minister Tony Blair, 10 Downing Street Letter which convey the Prime Minister on record stating again that he has INSTRUCTED that my complaints embodied in the letter addressed to him be passed to the Home Office which particularly has responsibility for the matters raised thereof.
-
Exhibit Ref:
Date: 23 July 2007
Item: Prime Minister Gordon Brown 10 Downing Street Letter showing a much more better understanding of the issues and unlike the previous occupant of the Office, concluded that the matters raised were not just the responsibility of the HOME OFFICE; but more accurately the Responsibility of both the Home Office and the MINISTRY of JUSTICE. Both of whom he INSTRUCTED that my letter be forwarded on to.
-
Exhibit Ref:
Date: 29th May 2008
Item: Prime Minister Gordon Brown 10 Downing Street Letter stating after having to yet write him again that the matters raised were the Responsibilities of the MINISTRY of JUSTICE and has INSTRUCTED that my letter be forwarded on to the Department.
Complaints to the Constitutional Monarch HRM Queen Elizabeth Windsor II
Complaints to Others
List of Services
-
Exhibit Ref:
Date: 15th December 2002
Item: Complain to The Attorney General
-
Exhibit Ref:
Date: 11th February 2004
Item: Complain to Micheal Howard, Conservative Party Shadow Government Leader
-
Exhibit Ref:
Date: 29th March 2004
Item: Complain to Micheal Howard, Conservative Party Shadow Government Leader
-
Exhibit Ref:
Date: 7th December 2005
Item: Complain to David Cameron
-
Exhibit Ref:
Date: 3rd June 2006
Item: Complain to Constitutional Affairs Committee Letter
-
Exhibit Ref:
Date: 3rd June 2006
Item: Home Affairs Committee Letter
-
Exhibit Ref:
Date: 3rd June 2006
Item: Human Rights committee Letter
-
Exhibit Ref:
Date: 10th October 2012
Item: Complain to the Judicial Appointments and Conducts Ombudsman
-
Exhibit Ref:
Date: 23rd April 2020
Item: Complain to Keir Starmer, Labour Shadow Government Leader
Response from others
List of Services
-
Exhibit Ref:
Date: 9th January 2003
Item: Stanley Best, then a Practicing Barrister and Chairman of the British Legal Association, provides an UNADULTEATED PROFESSIONAL OPINON as to the magnitude of the seriousness of the situation, if even just a scintilla of what is being, is true.
-
Exhibit Ref:
Date: 03 December 2003
Item: Lord Chief Justice Letter
-
Exhibit Ref:
Date: 05 March 2004
Item: Micheal Howard Letter
-
New List Item
Date: 24 March 2005
Item: Parliamentary Ombudsman Letter
-
Exhibit Ref:
Date: 20 December 2005
Item: Oliver Held Letter
-
Exhibit Ref:
Date: 22 December 2005
Item: David Cameron Letter
-
New List Item
Date: 3 February 2006
Item: David Davis Letter
-
Exhibit Ref:
Date: 3 February 2006
Item: David Davis Letter
-
New List Item
Dated: 16 June 2006
Item: Parliament Home Affairs Committee Letter
-
New List Item
Date: 22 June 2007
Item: Labour Party Letter
Civil Claim RIGHTS Under Section 7(1)(a) HRA 1998 and Article 5(5) HRA 1998 UNLAWFULLY Blocked from Entering the Courts for REDRESS by the Judiciaries Nefarious Behind Closed Doors Organised-Crime Syndicates, Preventing JUDICIAL ACCOUNTABILITY to the Law !!!
List of Services
-
Exhibit Ref: 1
Date: 30th January 2006
Item: Claim Lodged Against the THREE DEFENDANTS (Home Office, Attorney General and the Lord Chancellor's Department, for failures of their functional Duties and Responsibilities to ADDRESS and RECTIFY ODIOUS Judicial Violations Resulting in UNLAWFUL Imprisonments of Myself, Caul Grant and other Campaign for Truth and Justice Members, amounting to UK STATE LAW-BREAKING !!!.
-
Exhibit Ref:
Date: 16th May 2006
Item: The Judiciary's Administrative Court Management Utilising its NEFARIOUS Behind Closed Doors Organised-Crime Syndicate Convieniently labeled 'Master' to Summarily STRIKE-OUT Lawfully Grounded Claim under the Human Rights Act 1998; So as to prevent it from entering court for a HEARING of the FACTS of VIOLATIONS which include Judicial Criminal Perversion of Justice and Unlawful Imprisonments., that they want hidden.
-
Exhibit Ref: 1
Date: 12th August 2020
Item: Civil Action Claim Lodged Against THREE BELLIGERANT DEFENDANTS (the Home Office, Metropolitan Police Department, and the Judiciary of England and Wales's Ministry of Justice) which together have sought in colaboration to PERSECUTE the victims of their GROSS and ODIOUS VIOLATIONS with several False and Malicios Charges, Prosecutions, Unlawful Imprisonments; including UNSUCCESSFUL attempts to DEPORT from the UK WITHOUT going through the Courts in order to Coece an ABANDONMENT of our Demands for JUSTICE and REDRESS pursuit since 1998 !!!
-
New List Item
Date: 2nd October 2020
Item: Evidence of the Judiciary's Administrative Management Attempting to NEFARIOUSlLY OBSCURE Court Records with the help of its Behind Closed Doors Organised-Crime Syndicate; by DUPLICATING the Civil Action Certificate against the Judiciary's Ministry of Justice and the Action Againt the Metropolitan Police Department with each other, so as to hide and confuse all RECORDS and investigations leading to the CLAIMS.